Skip to main content
IdeaScale
  • Search
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Submit New Idea
Community Logo

U.S. Department of Labor Browse Popular ideas

Toggle navigation
  • More Pages
  • Welcome
  • Ideas (current)
Submit New Idea
Register To Contribute

Please create an account to cast your vote and join our community!

Create Account
Already have an account? Log in
  • Sort By Popular
    • Recent Ideas
    • Popular Ideas (current)
    • Hot Ideas
    • Random Ideas
  • Campaign All Ideas
    • Archived Campaigns
    • Shaping Smarter Regulations
  • Recent Ideas
  • Popular Ideas (current)
  • Hot Ideas
  • Random Ideas
No ideas found.
or jump to advanced search

Archived Campaigns [-]

  • Shaping Smarter Regulations

    Thanks to everyone who has posted your ideas and comments! Please continue to submit your ideas to retrospectivereview@dol.gov.

    The Department of Labor’s Regulatory Agenda will bring opportunity and economic security to working families, job-seekers, and retirees. As the Department pursues these regulatory efforts, we want to be smart about the way that we regulate.

    That’s why the Department is always reviewing existing regulations to ensure that we address any rules that may be out of date, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome and for potential opportunities to modify, streamline, expand, or even repeal rules based on what we have learned.

    Over the past five years, we have identified several of these rules, and have taken steps to streamline our regulations. For example, OSHA has published three Standards Improvement Projects (SIPs) that are intended to remove or revise duplicative, unnecessary, and inconsistent safety and health standards, and is now working on a fourth. We believe that these standards have reduced the compliance costs and eliminated or reduced the paperwork burden for a number of OSHA’s standards. And best of all, these projects have been a win-win, because OSHA only considers making such changes to its standards so long as they do not diminish employee protections.

    We need your help to help find other opportunities to shape smarter regulations! Please consider posting your input on the questions below by April 1, 2015 (note the extended deadline):

    • Which of the Department’s regulations, guidance, or interpretations should be considered for review, expansion or modification?  
    • What regulations and reporting requirements should be reviewed due to conflicts, inconsistencies, or duplication among our own agencies or with other federal agencies?
    • What reporting requirements and information collections can be streamlined or reduced in frequency while achieving the same level of protections for workers, job-seekers, and retirees? Are there less costly methods, advances in technology, or innovative techniques that can be leveraged toward these purposes?
    • What regulatory reforms may require short-term cost increases to the regulated entities while creating longer-term savings, for example, through the adoption of new technologies?  What information, data, or technical assistance do regulated entities need in order to better assess these opportunities?
    • How should the Department capture changes in firm and market behavior in response to a regulation?
    • What data or other indicators suggest that the estimated costs and benefits of an existing regulation should be reviewed?
    • What other strategies exist for increasing the flexibility of regulations without limiting important protections? What information, data, or other technical assistance do stakeholders require in order to better assess the long-term impact of these reforms upon such protections?

    As you answer these questions, it may help to consider areas marked by rapid technological change in a sector that could influence the structure and need for the regulation, whether the chosen regulatory approach will impose large ongoing costs on regulated entities, whether the agency is regulating in an area of significant uncertainty that may be lowered with a future retrospective study, and other conditions. Of course, we won’t be able to act on every idea immediately, but we look forward to considering your input in our ongoing internal review process.

    Thanks for helping the Department of Labor find more ways to shape smarter regulations!

    65
    50

Leaderboard [-]

  • Community Member
    629 points
    1
  • kyle.slade
    554 points
    2
  • sjflanagan
    546 points
    3
  • Theresa.Schulz
    266 points
    4
  • info
    252 points
    5
  • angelameyer
    211 points
    6
  • laurie.wells
    169 points
    7
  • assesuncoast
    155 points
    8
  • mfreedman
    146 points
    9
  • Community Member
    117 points
    10
[ View All ]

What we're discussing [-]

Subscribe [-]

  • New Ideas RSS Feed
  • Top Ideas RSS Feed
  • New Comments RSS Feed

Powered By

Powered by IdeaScale
Copyright © 2018 IdeaScale Change Management | Contact | IdeaScale End User Terms | Widget | IdeaScale Privacy Policy | IdeaScale Cookie Policy
Use arrow key to choose the Emoji. Press Esc to Close Emoji Picker. ×

Search Results

No emoji found

IdeaScale Emoji